Author Wang Pu

Before the NPC meeting on the afternoon of March 15, Pu met Liu Yuan, the political commissar of the General Logistics Department, in the Great Hall of the People. Liu took a look at the reporters chasing after him and hurried to hide. I said, Liu political commissar, just want to take a picture with you, no other meaning. Liu was relieved, and I took this photo ......
So why is Liu Yuan afraid of reporters? But it turns out that he used to face the media smile without answering, but this year was asked whether there is a bigger tiger, smile without saying has been unable to put off, and finally stifled a "you know", became the hot topic of the two sessions. So this time simply adopt the strategy of "if you can't afford to mess with, then hide", avoiding the battle.
In fact, by the reporter to catch the handle of the big brother far more than he one. Beijing from the capital to "the first blockade" is well known, the Minister of Transportation Yang Chuantang was asked, "your family shook the number shaken on it?", he said reluctantly for three consecutive years did not shake on it. He said he had no choice but to say that he hadn't been able to get on the lottery for three years in a row. Well, that's a good thing!
Shanxi is the anti-corruption disaster area, the reporter forced to ask: how do you see the anti-corruption in Shanxi this year? Wang Rulin replied "they are a pile of a pile of". Wow, this answer, Lei Ren, certainly exploded!
Look at see, the reporter how scary, a bad answer, it became a "focus interview". Therefore, as smart as Liu Yuan simply take "smile but not answer" tactics, both decent and give a person the feeling of profound. Worthy of being a celebrity after the door from ah.
But dodge is not a way to avoid the first day to avoid the fifteenth, so this year's "two sessions", Liu Yuan was finally "squeezed" out of the "material"... ...
In fact, the reporter is not terrible, as a profession, "how to ask" is the specialty of the reporter, for example, Pu brother has specialized in this area of effort, how to induce, how to side-step, how to "torture to force confessions", how to excite the general and so on. In short, once and Pu brother talk, will be "digging material".
So, what about not talking? Dig as usual! So Commissar Liu hides when he sees Pu, but I caught him again. I don't need you to talk to me! Haha!
In fact, in the face of the reporter, as long as you understand its laws, from the calm response, you will be in and out of trouble. Therefore, often interviewed friends, must learn a little coping skills, which is a rule to follow. For example, just now Pu brother breath to name a few ways to ask questions, summarized in no more than "induction" and "straight to the point". Therefore, in the face of the reporter's question, we should first judge whether the question is suitable to answer, and then consider how to answer appropriately. Never want to get rid of it once and for all, and avoid it at all times. For example, Liu Yuan political commissar, habitual avoidance, once cornered, open the "hit", not open the "hit". On the contrary, those who often take the initiative, the face of the limelight eloquent master, will not become the target of attack.
Why? Because you fulfill the interview needs of the reporter and at the same time know how to attack and defend. For example, Premier Zhu Rongji, he can sway the topic, this is very powerful. And former Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing, also a master.
However, they are already historical cases, so who is the master of response in the two sessions this year? In all fairness, it should be Sinopec Chairman Fu Chengyu.
"Do you feel any pressure when the inspection team is stationed at Sinopec?" You say this reporter's question is tricky, right? Answer yes or no are hit! Smile but not answer? More will give the reporter to seize the words to make a big fuss. For example, "the face of this question, Fu Chengyu avoided answering." "Fu Chengyu slightly embarrassed in the face of questions, do not know how to answer" and so on. This thing is no less than a bomb thrown out, probably even Sinopec's stock will fall. However, Mr. Fu deserves to be a veteran. He first smiled but did not answer, and then a "you ask this question", Duang, blocked the reporter's mouth.
The answer may seem crude, but it is actually a needle in a haystack. He is blaming the reporter, which is equivalent to saying, "Do you ask questions like this?" However, after blaming the other party and not letting him look bad, he dodged a bullet, don't you think it's high?
So what's next, in the face of another bombshell? The rumor of a merger between the two oil companies is confidential. If he doesn't answer, it's tantamount to acquiescence. How do you think he should answer? Mr. Fu, true to his word, asked, "Since it's a 'rumor', do you think it's true?"
The reporter has been lightly "beaten" by the reporter, how do you think the reporter is good?
In the face of reporters' questions, in addition to weighing the pros and cons, choose to answer the question to avoid the truth in addition to the false, pay attention to do not intentionally "shocking". For example, this time was seized by the handle of the speculation of a bank president, he in order to "spoil", said "banks are vulnerable groups", the delegates laughed, including participation in the discussion of Premier Li Keqiang could not help but laugh.
Why? Pro, you know! Another key point is that he pouts too much.
Another is that one must understand what the reporter is asking. The person who suffered the most in this regard was NPC deputy Shen Jilan. An article titled "Seeing this, will you still hack this old man? which documents the incident.
"At the time, the reporter asked if there was any communication with voters during the election. Shen Jilan's exact words were, no. We are relying on democratic elections here, it would be inappropriate for you to communicate, and if you are not elected, you should not go to 'each' (trouble) people."
Obviously, she misunderstood the reporter's question, thinking that by "communication", the reporter meant "canvassing" or even "bribing". As a result, her answer caused controversy and she was misunderstood as an incompetent NPC deputy who would only raise her hand to vote in favor. You see, how terrible!
In short, in the face of reporters' questions, the interviewee must know a little bit of offense and defense. Finally, I would like to send you a little "dry goods": the face of the question, the first answer to the key, interlinked, concise and clear, avoiding the important and light, comprehensive.
In this way, in the face of even more difficult questions from journalists can roar, not war, a war will be won!