A few days ago, the China-US Think Tank Dialogue on the South China Sea was held in Washington. Former State Councilor Dai Bingguo attended the Dialogue and delivered the opening keynote speech. At the meeting, Dai Bingguo re-emphasized his position on the South China Sea and expressed some views. Dai Bingguo said the U.S. and China interaction should return to rationalization, the U.S. strong intervention in the South China Sea is useless, even if the U.S. all10All the carriers in the South China Sea won't scare the Chinese.!

Dai Bingguo is not talking big, in fact, especially the Chinese people, they have never been afraid of the US attacking China. Whether you admit it or not, apart from Pakistan, the United States is undoubtedly the Chinese people's favorite country in the world. For most ordinary mainland consumers, the United States of all walks of life are the object of their pursuit of products, such as sports brand Nike for years in the domestic sales of Zen topped the list, the same market share of61%of Starbucks, the national favorite Haagen-Dazs ice cream, beer Budweiser, Apple cell phones, and Schutzhund mattresses,CKUnderpants, Ray-Ban glasses, Hollywood and highly rated American dramas that easily break domestic movie records and Douban ratings, etc. Almost all high-end products sold domestically, American brands have very high consumer loyalty and market share. In addition, according to the China International Migration Report(2015)Data from the Blue Book show that2000~2013In 2007, the population of mainland China that was granted permanent residency in the United States was about90.3The United States is the country with the highest number of Chinese immigrants, followed by Canada. According to the data, the United States is the country with the highest number of Chinese immigrants, followed by Canada. The U.S. is also the country that overall Chinese tourists want to visit the most, the country where overall mainland Chinese children study the most, and the country where they want to immigrate the most.

So, are the Chinese really afraid of the United States? I'm afraid that some Chinese are not only not afraid of the United States, but rather quite in love with it. The U.S., by marketing its"Democracy and freedom"values, has circled a large number of fans in China. And among some crazy fans, they even expect China and the United States to go to war earlier, and the United States to bring the spring breeze of freedom and democracy to their own land after defeating China.

There is no denying that American democracy has delivered a lot of benefits to the people of the Mainland, and without the timely prodding of American democracy, China might have gone the way of North Korea. To a certain extent, the human rights and other issues frequently questioned by the United States to the Chinese Government have indirectly uplifted the human rights of the Chinese masses, or accelerated the democratization process in China, and raised the happiness index of certain residents. But the nation still has to realize that American democracy is a"multi-level marketing"The game, he paints a rosy blueprint of humanity, constantly developing a downline, while the ultimate goal is to make money for himself. Occasionally, this MLM leader in the United States will hold up individual people who are on the road to prosperity because of the democratic"managers"(e.g., Korea) placed next to some stubborn underlings to constantly polish the subject's will.

The democratic marketing in the United States always gives some residents who are dissatisfied with their lives the illusion that democracy will make their lives better and richer, but the reality is that it is never democracy but the power of scientific and technological development that makes people's lives better. However, it is never democracy but the power of scientific and technological development that makes people's lives better. In modern times, not to mention the Western countries, there is no country in the whole world where people's lives are getting richer and better because of democracy. At present, except for some countries in the Middle East, which are sitting on a large amount of natural property left by Mother Earth"children of entrepreneurs who became wealthy under Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in the 1980s"Countries, ordinary countries are relying on their own scientific and technological productivity towards wealth and prosperity. Of course, there are some exceptions, such as the United States is relying on the war to get rich, the United States of America democracy, although the good talk, but he himself is not relying on democracy to start, the United States at that time all over the slave masters and slaves, how to come to the democratic freedom? Did Germany rely on democracy to sweep across the continent? Did China's Tang Dynasty rely on democracy? Did the rise of Singapore and Japan (gatekeepers) rely on democracy?

Not only can democracy not be a meal, but the United States will not bring democracy and affluence to China at all. The world's resources are limited, and all competition is a zero-sum game. The rise of some countries means the decline of others, and in order to maintain its resources and ability to lead the world in the future, the U.S. needs to plunder desperately, and even if it can't loot everything, paralyzing a country so that it can't compete with itself is still the goal.

A war between the United States and China cannot possibly make China's future better. Judging from the several contemporary wars waged by the United States against foreign countries, take Iraq as an example, initially, the Iraqi people also hoped that the United States could rescue them from Saddam's tyranny, and when the United States marched into Baghdad back then, there were a large number of Iraqi citizens who greeted them with a welcome on the sandwiched roads. What happened? Fifteen percent of Iraqis lost their lives in the U.S.-Iraqi war, and now Iraq has been reduced to an earthly region, full of drugs, profiteering, disease and famine, with many Iraqi parents going so far as to feed their children sleeping pills in order to keep them from starving. And what about Iraq before the war? It was a dominant party, economically, culturally and politically. Has the US brought goodness and prosperity to the Iraqi people? With the exception of Japan, which was an image project, the U.S. has never again through a war"benefit (e.g. the people)"This is true of any country, of Afghanistan, of Libya, of Syria.

Democracy in the United States is hypocritical and directionally waged. Earlier, there was a democracy movement in the Middle Eastern country of Kingdom of Bahrain because the democratization of Bahrain could be detrimental to the interests of the monarchy, Saudi Arabia. Immediately thereafter, Saudi Arabia launched a brutal crackdown on the democracy movement in Bahrain. Yet the United States, which has always called for democracy, turned a blind eye to this incident simply because Saudi Arabia is a friendly ally of the United States; because Saudi Arabia can provide the United States with great benefits! So far, no American president in history has ever taken the initiative to discuss the issue of democracy with this dictatorship in the true sense of the word. Is the United States really trying to help all mankind achieve democracy?

Democracy in the United States is nothing more than a looting package, a plot long in the making. Earlier, in the last century, the U.S. had not yet developed a profitable model of how to cash in on democracy. Because back then, the U.S."shearer"The technique has been practiced as if it were pure and has been successful time and again. And when this set of tricks has been recognized by the world, especially when the application in China failed, the United States realized that they have to carry out a set of new programs. It must be said that the U.S. program is very well written, such as the election of blacks to the U.S. presidency, a puppy as mayor, the legal possession of firearms, legal drug use, all of these make the people living honestly in the dictatorship of the country is very much looking forward to and"be eager to give sth a try"The United States has capitalized on the inferiority and nature of human beings. The United States has capitalized on the inferiority and nature of human beings, so this tactic of democracy has been so successful that it has almost swept the whole world. The United States is particularly keen on marketing democracy to some underdeveloped regions because it knows very well that this set of"high"Democracy is not suitable for use in regions that are not supported by industry and capital, otherwise it will only plunge the country into a swamp from which it will be difficult to climb out. Especially when a country wants to cross"Medium income"Trap, which requires a strong regulatory capacity and highly centralized executive power to enable the country to overcome the contradictions of economic development, on the contrary, democracy is prone to accumulation of contradictions in the early stages of development, if all corners of the democratic aspirations of the endless debate, different areas of the people are opposed to different policy resistance, decision-making does not get support and action, the country will naturally stagnate. Mexico, Brazil, the Philippines, Malaysia, South Africa and many other countries have not crossed this cruel threshold for more than four decades. And how did Japan, South Korea and Singapore, which have successfully stepped into the developed world, do it? Undoubtedly all is to increase the centralization of government, macro-control. At present, democracy has revealed its shortcomings: inefficiency, racial polarization, and the consumption of a large amount of human and material resources. The only countries that can overcome these shortcomings are developed countries that have completed capital accumulation, have a strong industrial base, and are more ethnically homogeneous, because these countries are usually more"affordable". And equipping a multiracial, industrially backward country such as India, which has already accumulated a culture, tends to slow down the country's progress. Some scholars predict that India, with its universal democracy, may never catch up with China.

So how does America cash in on democracy? In fact, the principle is somewhat similar to the current Netflix model, but not all. First of all, the United States through democracy to package itself as a beautiful appearance, people want to be in the wrong Netflix, through a variety of media to let the audience first recognize and then understand the final formation of goodwill. In the initial stage, the United States can use this layer of goodwill value to make their country's goods premium while providing endorsements to penetrate the"visitors (an exhibition etc)"market, and the Internet Netflix economy+(Taobao) model is the same. In the second step, after people learn about Taobao stores in the US, the American big web celebrities can output some spiritual guides on their stores to cultivate the loyalty of their fans. In the third step, the American big netroots tell people that Taobao is too shameless and dominant, and we should boycott Taobao and set up more shopping sites. Then the fans believe it, so they have to boycott Taobao, causing it to close down. If this step does not go very well, the big red may head by the way called on Baidu, Tencent several other industry bigwigs together with a big crusade against Taobao. In the end, the fans no longer have a shopping site, it is difficult to establish order for a while, what should be done at this time? At this point, the United States will take the lead to establish an Amazon, the consumer harvest. Or simply do not care, as long as the Taobao competitor knocked down, their ultimate goal has been achieved.

For the U.S., maybe the second and third steps are harder to take because they are more ambitious and the fans are not all stupid. But the first step is often more successful, the more backward the place the more welcome American products, Vietnam Philippines without exception. The essence of America's promotion of democracy is for its own sake, either to fight hostile forces or to establish its own power in the whole world, so as to stabilize its position as the boss and keep dividing and exploiting.

Democracy in the United States is ambitious, at least in the light of previous cases where humanitarian wars waged by the United States under the slogan of democracy and freedom for the benefit of the people of other countries did not end up bringing prosperity to those countries. Democracy in the US is also imperfect and does not apply to any country around the globe and it can be observed that many countries are half dead because of democracy. The democracy promoted by the United States has not at any stage brought prosperity and wealth to the country and allowed the people to run towards a prosperous society. What the world should need to see is that the U.S. push for democracy"universal value"It is hypocritical and does not stand up to scrutiny. Of course, democracy is in line with the deep-seated interests of the general public, and the Chinese people should also be grateful to the United States for making things difficult for the Chinese Government in respect of human rights. To sum up, the successful marketing of democracy by the United States has won the goodwill of the people of many countries in the world, and China is no exception. China is no exception. The Chinese people love the U.S. very much, so there is no fear of the U.S. at all, and there are even some fanatics who are always waiting for the U.S."refers the Communists' victory over the Nationalists in 1949"China.

It's very strange that the Chinese people are so interested in comparing the various U.S.Russia, which is weaker in every aspect, is instead more wary? Democracy is a good thing, and China should promote and insist on democratic reforms. However, if one equates democracy with the United States and believes that the American Empire is the only way to bring democracy to China, then obviously this is aA national catastrophe.