Kangxi radical 118/ cultural scholar center of the Han dynasty (206 BC-220 AD)

Political culture, in terms of its genesis, is a system of knowledge that ensures the primacy and glory of the community, and no one will reverse the choice of conceptual formations that are detrimental to him or her, much less voluntarily give up or devalue his or her own civilizational attributes in order to be defined by the Other. Therefore, even at a time when globalized capital is intermingling and trying to dismantle the barrier of national self-defense, forcing "independence" to be unsustainable, a genuinely effective political strategy should seek its own self, be self-reliant, and be integrated with China's human conditions in order to activate public opinion and rebuild social confidence. In essence, national capacity and its political success or failure is not a matter of whether democracy or autocracy is better or worse as discussed in the court of public opinion, nor is it a matter of theoretical secrets that are made up out of thin air, but rather a game of power dominated by the actual armed forces, finances, and financial packages. The so-called world tide is so powerful that those who go along with it will prosper and those who go against it will perish, and there are all kinds of reasons for the rise and fall of national fortunes, but the reality is mostly not the so-called civilization replacing stupidity and democracy being superior to dictatorship; on the contrary, the filtering mechanism is still the law of the jungle; it originates from the battle of wits and courage and the combination of differentiation triggered by the imbalance of power in the geometrical mechanics and is established by the world's rules and spheres of influence through the weighing of advantages and disadvantages and the estimation of inputs and outputs.

The history and experience of the choice of national polity reveals that politics has always been less ready-made preconceived ideas and doctrine, and does not follow the fixed equations and function decoding, where there is no permanent correct universal logic, and less empty universal relief and civilization model, but rely on the strength of the breakthrough, and seek to assess the situation after the live learning, or make the best of the situation, improvise and adapt to "the art of" grasp. The "art" of grasping. Therefore, whether it is based on conservative strategic adjustments, or touch the core of the system of innovation, must be adapted to local conditions, the pursuit of feasible and effective, the theory of theories can be far-flung, foreign for the use of the Chinese, can also catch up with the fashion to make a bunch of marginal modern concepts and definitions, but all political causes must be relevant to the national conditions, take care of the overall situation, based on the livelihood of the people in order to reshape the country's morality and thus win the trust of the people. Otherwise, even though it may look good to sit around and talk about "personal sovereignty", it will not be able to hit the nail on the head and solve the actual problem.

Given China's large size and long history, its endogenous political and religious ethics have always advocated the people's harmony, cultivating culture and virtue to serve people from afar; therefore, in addition to striking a balance between righteousness and profitability in terms of value theory, with the scholar, farmer, industrialist, and businessman in their respective roles, the cultural orientation is even more inherited, and all people in the world are concerned about benefiting the country, and taking the world as their own responsibility for the "idealism" of the strategy. Because of this, any civilization in the modern context of self-evidence of glory, selective "filtering of history" in order to show that the country's political correctness is not only the right thing to do, the return of the identity of the community members, a sense of honor and confidence in the evaluation of the public opinion and social expectations of the public opinion, etc., on the national capacity and political development of the value and significance of the indispensable. After all, as far as human embodiment of social relations is concerned, anyone likes to conceal evil and promote good, not to be degraded, not to mention the
It is a common practice in ancient and modern times to humiliate oneself for being inferior to the "wrong path of the family and the country or the name", and this is true for individuals as well as for the shaping of the country and the civilization of the society.

Generally speaking, as a conceptual form, the spirituality of political culture is inevitably restricted by the corresponding social structure and conditions of birth, and therefore always retains certain cultural genes and local knowledge that cannot be transplanted. Perhaps, based on the evaluation of the performance of a particular country, such as the material advantages, technological capabilities, and competitive strategies corresponding to the national economy and people's livelihoods, etc., there are indeed practical and quantitative indicators, but the humanistic temperament, social psychology, and meaning of life accumulated in history, which belong to the conceptual form and feeling level of the "realm", only have a difference in form but not in advancement or backwardness. There is no advanced or backwardness, but only morphological differences. However, paradoxically.Ever since "political altruism" has been implanted as a convention in the spirit of nation-states, the interpretation of truth around the "classics" practiced by each has become the ideology of community division, competition for national capabilities and the so-called "clash of civilizations" (see below). It has become the ideology of community division, competing national capabilities and the so-called "clash of civilizations theory". This not only means that the original attribute of justice in politics may be replaced by national interests, but also marks the establishment of the world's "egocentrism" in all but name. Since then, not only has the civilization of the military, the bullying of the weak, the conquest of the world and the transformation of the world enjoyed immunity from "international morality", but it has also become the spiritual goblet of individualism, which has led to the centrifugalization of society because of its claim to be "universal".

It is in order to ensure the political correctness of this assertion that the interference and naturalization of social, natural and even civilizational differences have become self-evident truths for the constructors of the modern order and the "cosmopolitans". Thus the free trade that accompanies globalization, currencyWar and new technology promotion,There is a wide range of unearned capital cash and all sorts of faddism, as well as political partisanship, community polarization and the intoxication of private consumption and entertainment, all of which have a wide range and no shortage of personal "comforts"., butNo matter how it is named or rationalized, it is essentially a "marketing" and expedient plan based on national interest and capital priority, only that the real intention is hidden and replaced by a civilization deconstruction that does not see any smoke and appears to be "warm and tender". On the surface, the world looks like a world of peace and prosperity, as if the world has become a commonwealth and close to the "end of history", but in fact, based on the shortage of resources and unlimited desire for the distribution of the relationship between the countries, still do not compete for fame and fortune, the undercurrent of social Darwinism. It is hard to know that this kind of naturalization of "soft power", in which no weapons are seen and everything is permitted without reason or taboo, is not only not easy to cause alarm or even confrontation.,It also makes a lot of people long for love and obsession, thinking that this is civilized relief and political transcendence, thus interpreting irresponsibility and pandering to the countryside as happiness in life and calling it individuality and liberalism.

As a result, some people think that social progress means resorting to political denunciation, confrontation of interests and protests in the streets for official licenses, or agreeing to prioritize private rights, allowing "civil disobedience" and thus "the marketplace to determine" all social relations, and influencing the issues of the state, in order to Ensure that everyone has the opportunity to take over and take turns.Accordingly, the so-called civil rights and quality theory, institutionalism, belief culture and backwardness of national character, etc., all of which have been externally induced and internally guided by repeated speeches, seem to point to China's "political incorrectness" in the recent times, and thus preconceived notions have been made to relate all kinds of bad things to China's identity and history. Thus, from scholars and officials down to the people, whether it is the "great cause of the country" or daily frustration, they all follow the trend of cultural denunciation and political attribution, or to take the national "uncivilized, uncompetitive" to say things. Of course, there may not be a lack of deep love and hate for the national spirit of the country out of the "quarantine" of reflection and introspection, but most of the people who are keen on this theory are just some of the unknown reasoning, people cloud, seemingly outstanding, but privately it is more like to compensate for the life of "boredom" of cynicism, although the words "boring". The cynicism of the world, although the rhetoric is grand, but the bones are not less than the poor love the rich, eating outside the sneer and mercenary.

The holographic study of facts is the basis for the cultivation of social virtues. As far as organizational forms and methodologies are concerned, dictatorship and democracy can only be, and can only be, a power game in which a few people are "present", and only the directions and paths chosen are different; neither of them will necessarily produce good governance based on universal principles, nor contribute to the realization of the ideal of a "good society" of equality and freedom. Neither will necessarily produce good governance based on universal principles, nor will they help realize the ideal of a "good society" of equality and freedom. If we look at the scale effect alone, the former is only confined to the internal intellectual struggle of a few people or private grants, and emphasizes the "unlimited responsibility" of inheriting the past and the future and social power; the latter tends to seek internal and external affairs, and encourages the majority to make decisions, but in essence, it is still a "revolving circle" in which the insiders are confronted with the outsiders and the "ignorant masses" are not allowed to take any action. But in essence, it is still a "revolving door" for the insiders to face the "ignorant public" of the outsiders. Therefore, no matter whether it is dictatorship or democracy, if it is based on personal or factional stance and disregards the fairness of people's hearts and minds, Whether it is a top-down "top-level design" or a bottom-up procedural vote, the majority's motives can hardly be transformed into a constructive political ethic and moral program. Therefore, even if there is an enlightened debate, it is difficult for the majority to translate their motives into constructive political ethics and moral commitments., publicIt's also just self-serving political mugging and opportunistic evasions.,Although the social disputes arising from this are lively, their starting point is still to make use of "public opinion" to gain fame, or to predetermine the issues to form parties for personal gain.rivers and lakes in turmoilThe

In China, in particular, if there is no moral force that transcends personal interests, the political culture it advocates, no matter how enlightened and rational it may be, or how much it is "in line with the world", will hardly gain widespread social support. As we all know, criticizing the people is no substitute for criticizing the people, and once political issues are touched upon, it is necessary to seek truth from facts, and to empower the people to participate in the creation of history and the building of the future with the spirit of ownership, instead of framing it as a castor seed root "reversal" or the so-called populist transgressions. Otherwise, if we only rely on the "power of thought" that does not see any fireworks and lacks any rational basis, not only will we not be able to change the irrational political pattern, but we will also make the people concerned suffer in their lives, and we will be deprived of our energy and efforts without being able to do anything. Generally speaking, institutionalism, in which "all scholars are addicted to what they see" (in Shang Yang's words), has an obvious tendency to be "mechanistic", and is therefore prone to interpret the society as a demystified world, and to define it as a rational subject with no moral vision, disposition and will, thus neglecting the power of thought to feed and arm the people, as well as the power to make the people's minds work. Thus, it neglects the nobility and sanctity of the idea of "feeding and arming the people" as well as "governing with virtue".

So.Summarizing the true codes of national political risk.The essence is not only limited to solving the demand for the right of "economic man's rationality", between the limited resources and the unlimited expansion of human desire, its internal driving force, in addition to the never-ending "monetization" of the financial policy, should also be the personal cultivation of the body and correctness of character. Inner Sage, Outer King and Modern Society"The "three views" are integrated. In particularChinese politics, All social problems are related to it.Therefore, the validity of the state's "unlimited liability" has always been more than just a digital analysis of variables, nor is it an isolated certification of a single event, but rather a mental lesson in the capriciousness of human nature. BecauseMainstream China doesn't support pushback, Nor does the cultural orthodoxy accept the separation of powers., happeningBut within the existing rules, we can make use of the situation.,And to understand the layout of the personnel in the midst of the chaos.,It is only by doing so that we can make a difference and then innovate the system. As we all know, ChinaSociety has always been about taking care of each other and lifting each other up., Emphasizing the erosion of interpersonal differences from within,In order to reach a community of "wealth and riches, do not forget each other", the emphasis is on the protection of relatives without regard to class positions and factional rivalries. In short,is neither a metaphysical classification of organizations,It doesn't matter if it's a doctrinaire creed.,It's more of a push-yourself-over, hello-me, hello-everyone-is-okay kind of thing.

in the light ofIn terms of the sequencing of political developments, China is not civilization is not high enough but precocious, is the country people believe in the hearts of people to the good, there is no class, so traditionally valued both virtue and cultivation and the difference between literature and the wild, culture is more inclined to the ethical human feelings rather than accustomed to the "market transactions". Therefore, it can be said that the root cause of the stability of Chinese politics lies in the ideals of selecting the best and the brightest, and the ideal of public and private governance.,This kind of evaluation based on the comparison of the merits and demerits of virtue and ability is, for the Chinese people,Not only is it a prerequisite for gathering people's hearts and minds and thus being politically effective,It is also an orientation to the meaning of life and an identification with the "decent society". It is for this reason that,Individuals and organizations do not care about popular concepts and political positions, but are more afraid of being woven into a bad reputation for morality and integrity. Therefore, putting the people first and using foreigners for Chinese purposes is not only the spiritual core of Chinese political philosophy, but also the only option for the future. Therefore, no matter how much they try to put on an international image and make pacifist gestures, they can only be a group of "refined egoists" (in Qian Liqun's words) who are pampered and not in touch with the people's spirit, but rather look like some people who only want to work for nothing but to become a dominant force in politics. They are not only difficult to become a dominant force in politics, but also look like some profiteers who only want to get something for nothing and fish in troubled waters.

Although open politics can tolerate criticism, Endorsement of the "division of wealth and profit" and the illusion of a shift in power or the possibility of redistribution,A sense of freedom and relaxation while developing the views of the majority, and the freedom to be creative without being held accountable., Can also be a person a theory to denounce or even encourage social selfishness, not the right way, looking for some of the righteousness of the people in disregard of the reality of the community, and the national interests of the country contrary to the,But the modern political culture follows the same old traditional paths,That is, clear and effective social assistance and active advocacy by the masses. Thus, while "The principle of "people's loyalty" has been repeatedly criticized by a group of worldly-minded people as "populism".,However, the ethics of church and state, accumulated over thousands of years, have not only become firmly established in national public opinion, but are also the optimal choice for personal livelihood and "honor" in the world today (as long as the state survives).Therefore, in order to carry out the cause of politics, we must be attentive to the hearts of the people of the good and bad, its quality or not, the system is also the same, the people of the country or those people, things are still those things, as the so-called people to promote the road and not the road to promote people. Therefore, allTo be political, you have to go with the flow.The mass line is to do what is right, not to seek profit, and to serve the people with all our hearts and souls.