If you were wrongly imprisoned, who would save you?
2023-07-07Village headman rolls up 400 million, misappropriation of public funds so simple
2023-07-07What's the point??They steal your money and you have to make up the shortfall.
The pension of Li Guixia, a self-employed person in Chengde City, Hebei Province, in this year's1The payment was suddenly stopped in the month. The reason for this was that Bai Xuesuan, a section officer of the Social Security Administration, had taken advantage of a loophole in pension insurance and kept some of the social security benefits for himself. The shortfall caused by Bai Xuesuan needed to be made up by the more than two hundred participants themselves.
It is no coincidence that Bai Xuesuan is not the only one in Chengde who took advantage of the loopholes in the local social insurance system to enrich himself. According to the criminal verdict of the first trial of Fu Xinghua's embezzlement and fraud, which was made public by China's adjudication documents website, Fu Xinghua, the head of the labor dispute arbitration unit of the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Fengning County, under the jurisdiction of Chengde City, in the2009surname Nian6months to2013surname Nian1During the month of January, he fraudulently obtained Yang's pension insurance benefits through various means by applying for pension insurance for another person.1997500Dollars.
The criminal judgment of the first trial of Fu Xinghua's embezzlement and fraud shows that most of the money Fu Xinghua embezzled and defrauded was not recovered. And who is going to make up for the unrecovered money? Let's just say that the unrecovered money in Bai Xuesuan's case was made up by the participants themselves.
The clerk of the Social Security Administration has shortchanged the insurance benefits, but in the end, the participants are made to pay for it themselves. Such a thing is just like when you go to the supermarket to buy something and give the money to the cashier, who gives you the computerized ticket but not the money to the supermarket, and in the end, although you take the computerized ticket, the supermarket says that you have to pay the bill again if you want to take something away. Obviously because of their own organization within the improper employment, inadequate supervision caused by the loss, but let the customer to take the blame to pay the bill. What kind of reasoning is this? This is simply unreasonable! When Bai Xuesuan, as an on-the-job clerk at the Social Security Administration, receives the pension of an individual household and has already entered the information into the pension insurance system of the Social Security Administration and issued a really pension insurance handbook and personal account statement, it is a functional act of the staff of the social security department and should be recognized as a contribution to the pension insurance. Since all the information about the pension insurance of the participant is true, what reason is there to ask the participant to continue to make contributions?
So what kind of system loophole could have made it so easy for both of these men to exploit?
On January 1, 2010, the Interim Measures for the Transfer and Continuation of the Basic Pension Insurance Relationships of Urban Enterprise Employees were implemented nationwide, ending the history of pension insurance not being able to be transferred and continued in other places.
In the same year, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security also issued the Notice on the Construction and Application of the System for Transferring and Continuing the Basic Pension Insurance Relationships of Urban Enterprises and Employees, proposing to carry out the construction of an information system for the transfer of social insurance relationships, shifting from a manual transfer business model to an electronic transfer business model, and realizing the access to the network of all cities and municipalities throughout the country in 2011.
However, the construction of the off-site transfer system of the Chengde City Social Security Bureau is seriously lagging behind, and the transfer of pension insurance relations is still in the mode of transferring business mainly by hand. If the social security payment system of the place where the relationship is transferred from and the city of Chengde are not networked, the Chengde City Social Security Bureau will not be able to inquire about the payment status of the transferred person because it is unable to verify the payment documents, and will only look at the pension insurance transfer slip and the statement. Bai Xuesuan and Fu Xinghua took advantage of this system loophole to commit the crime.
A so obvious system loopholes, but the relevant departments have not been to plug it, in the end is not yet noticed or intentionally let go? In the current China, many systems have loopholes, but the consequences of the loopholes should not let the people to pay the bill, the responsibility will be put on the people will eventually lose the people. Your internal bugs, your people have problems, kill the bugs to check the people responsible for the people is a credible unit should do.


